<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could McKie Be An Option?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vikingsgab.com/2010/03/16/could-mckie-be-an-option/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vikingsgab.com/2010/03/16/could-mckie-be-an-option/</link>
	<description>The Definitive Minnesota Vikings Blog!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:34:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Purple Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.vikingsgab.com/2010/03/16/could-mckie-be-an-option/comment-page-1/#comment-18981</link>
		<dc:creator>Purple Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vikingsgab.com/?p=3151#comment-18981</guid>
		<description>Ole, ha ha  I watched that about 8 times, that was awesome!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ole, ha ha  I watched that about 8 times, that was awesome!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Warwas</title>
		<link>http://www.vikingsgab.com/2010/03/16/could-mckie-be-an-option/comment-page-1/#comment-18939</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Warwas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 05:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vikingsgab.com/?p=3151#comment-18939</guid>
		<description>We didn&#039;t do a live chat during the Rams game... I was on a flight to minnesota during that one.  Maybe he did that in a different game, can&#039;t remember.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We didn&#8217;t do a live chat during the Rams game&#8230; I was on a flight to minnesota during that one.  Maybe he did that in a different game, can&#8217;t remember.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigjohnny84</title>
		<link>http://www.vikingsgab.com/2010/03/16/could-mckie-be-an-option/comment-page-1/#comment-18938</link>
		<dc:creator>bigjohnny84</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vikingsgab.com/?p=3151#comment-18938</guid>
		<description>I remember that play on the live-chat. And how the numbers were going to go up because nobody was worried about tahi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember that play on the live-chat. And how the numbers were going to go up because nobody was worried about tahi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Warwas</title>
		<link>http://www.vikingsgab.com/2010/03/16/could-mckie-be-an-option/comment-page-1/#comment-18937</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Warwas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vikingsgab.com/?p=3151#comment-18937</guid>
		<description>Interesting take.

I think giving a grade of some sort is more than anybody else does (including the NFL) when it comes to grading blocking.  

I KNOW I didn&#039;t like Tahi&#039;s blocking this year... but didn&#039;t see enough of McKie to make an assessment of my own, thus I decided to use PFF as a reference for this article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting take.</p>
<p>I think giving a grade of some sort is more than anybody else does (including the NFL) when it comes to grading blocking.  </p>
<p>I KNOW I didn&#8217;t like Tahi&#8217;s blocking this year&#8230; but didn&#8217;t see enough of McKie to make an assessment of my own, thus I decided to use PFF as a reference for this article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Warwas</title>
		<link>http://www.vikingsgab.com/2010/03/16/could-mckie-be-an-option/comment-page-1/#comment-18936</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Warwas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vikingsgab.com/?p=3151#comment-18936</guid>
		<description>haha, you pointing that out made me double check... his #&#039;s were skewed by his 32 yard scramble against the Rams (I think it was the Rams).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha, you pointing that out made me double check&#8230; his #&#8217;s were skewed by his 32 yard scramble against the Rams (I think it was the Rams).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c.carterhof</title>
		<link>http://www.vikingsgab.com/2010/03/16/could-mckie-be-an-option/comment-page-1/#comment-18935</link>
		<dc:creator>c.carterhof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vikingsgab.com/?p=3151#comment-18935</guid>
		<description>Thats  right  johnny,  or  just  give  em  all  zero&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats  right  johnny,  or  just  give  em  all  zero&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fozz44</title>
		<link>http://www.vikingsgab.com/2010/03/16/could-mckie-be-an-option/comment-page-1/#comment-18934</link>
		<dc:creator>Fozz44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vikingsgab.com/?p=3151#comment-18934</guid>
		<description>Tahi with a 4.1 average per catch? That is certainly not true. He&#039;s the master at turning 6 yard gains into 1 yard losses on catches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tahi with a 4.1 average per catch? That is certainly not true. He&#8217;s the master at turning 6 yard gains into 1 yard losses on catches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lost Viking</title>
		<link>http://www.vikingsgab.com/2010/03/16/could-mckie-be-an-option/comment-page-1/#comment-18933</link>
		<dc:creator>Lost Viking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vikingsgab.com/?p=3151#comment-18933</guid>
		<description>Now, if we could only teach DooGun to snap the ball on punts and FGs we&#039;d have an xtra roster spot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, if we could only teach DooGun to snap the ball on punts and FGs we&#8217;d have an xtra roster spot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigjohnny84</title>
		<link>http://www.vikingsgab.com/2010/03/16/could-mckie-be-an-option/comment-page-1/#comment-18931</link>
		<dc:creator>bigjohnny84</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vikingsgab.com/?p=3151#comment-18931</guid>
		<description>CC, so in other words we need to see some game film on the guys and make up our own minds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CC, so in other words we need to see some game film on the guys and make up our own minds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c.carterhof</title>
		<link>http://www.vikingsgab.com/2010/03/16/could-mckie-be-an-option/comment-page-1/#comment-18930</link>
		<dc:creator>c.carterhof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vikingsgab.com/?p=3151#comment-18930</guid>
		<description>It  seems  PFF  does  try  to  do  an  in depth  job  at  rating  players.  But  while  reading  their  rating  rules  I  saw  this-

What we definitely DO NOT do is raise or lower the grading because we&#039;re not sure. Giving -0.5 rather than -1 or -1.5 because you can&#039;t be certain what went on is wrong. The correct score is 0.

I  disagree.
Thats  like  saying  you&#039;re  not  sure  about  a  hit  in  baseball,  and  giving  the  guy  an  0  for  0  in  the  box  score.  He  either  got  a  hit  or  he  didnt.

I  understand  football  is  different,  but  the  guy  either  did  his  job  or  he  did  not.  Ya  gotta  give  some  kinda  score  for  the  play,  or  find  another  way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It  seems  PFF  does  try  to  do  an  in depth  job  at  rating  players.  But  while  reading  their  rating  rules  I  saw  this-</p>
<p>What we definitely DO NOT do is raise or lower the grading because we&#8217;re not sure. Giving -0.5 rather than -1 or -1.5 because you can&#8217;t be certain what went on is wrong. The correct score is 0.</p>
<p>I  disagree.<br />
Thats  like  saying  you&#8217;re  not  sure  about  a  hit  in  baseball,  and  giving  the  guy  an  0  for  0  in  the  box  score.  He  either  got  a  hit  or  he  didnt.</p>
<p>I  understand  football  is  different,  but  the  guy  either  did  his  job  or  he  did  not.  Ya  gotta  give  some  kinda  score  for  the  play,  or  find  another  way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
